March 2005 - Pants-ing Tradition

Insights, Gripes, and Conjecture

Insights, Gripes, and Conjecture

By Anthony J. Lockwood

French soldiers wore bright red pants and powder blue tunics at the start of World War I. Through battle’s haze, soldiers from the Central Powers could see the French infrantry’s red pantaloons charging into battle like you can see taillights in fog. This advantage enabled entrenched machine-gunners to mow the French down in appalling quantities.

French commanders, sensing this would not do, ordered a change to less visible powder blue pants. Traditionalists, safely away from the battlefield naturally, howled in mighty displeasure. The French militaire had always worn red pants, thundered editorial writers and veteran’s groups.

It’s idle speculation to guess the number of casualties that might have been averted if the color change had happened without the ridiculous debate. But it can be said that the traditionalists’ death-grip on their notion of conventional troop attire did not help.

   
Lockwood.
What does this have to do with engineering? Well, many managers and many do-bees like you and me are hidebound traditionalists when it comes to breaking with the past, even when faced with the obvious.

In the trenches where you slog daily, traditionalists clutch to yesterday’s thinking and processes with a death-grip that surely does not help your business. Perhaps some of the 3 million manufacturing jobs mowed down over the past few years would have survived if more of us broke with the comfortable ways of the past.

From really smart DE subscriber Sherman in Massachusetts comes the question that inspired this rant: What will be the trigger to mass adoption of upfront and concurrent CAE? The answer, I fear, is that old guys like me—50-somethings who dominate middle and upper management—need to let go of the past or move out of the way.

Too many of us have morphed into the cranky, know-it-all old guys that drove us nuts when first we joined the labor pool. Too many of us cling to old ways that were new 25 years ago.

These ways served us well over the years, and they still work. And that’s the problem. They still work. A shot of bourbon and a burly friend with pliers still works to extract a tooth, too.

Look, applications, processes, and roles have changed. Take an integrated analysis suite such as Flomerics: It challenges the natural order that we’ve applied to the electronic design process. Upfront CFD, such as CFdesign, designed from the get-go to partner with the MCAD process, blurs the bright lines that had previously defined our cozy functional boundaries.

Designers must think analysis; analysts and machiners working cheek to cheek. Function trumps geometry. Concurrency. What is going on here?

Change. Evolution. “Times they are a-changing.” Those in our cohort slow to adopt new tools, new processes, the new natural order of things are getting mowed down by the innovators.

Clinging to the old ways out of misguided tradition assures failure. Risk losing your old, comfortable red pants and embrace change for success.

Thanks, Pal.—Lockwood

Share This Article

Subscribe to our FREE magazine, FREE email newsletters or both!

Join over 90,000 engineering professionals who get fresh engineering news as soon as it is published.


About the Author

Anthony J. Lockwood's avatar
Anthony J. Lockwood

Anthony J. Lockwood is Digital Engineering’s founding editor. He is now retired. Contact him via [email protected].

Follow DE

Related Topics

Uncategorized   All topics
#11180