CubeSat Challenge Winners Announced

Winners of the 3D printed CubeSat Challenge were recently announced.

The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys.


CubeSats are the next generation vehicle for space research. About the size of a Rubik’s Cube, the small satellites are packed full of electronics and released into space. The cost of a producing and launching a CubeSat is a fraction of that required of larger satellites, making them perfect for any research team on a tight budget.

In May, GrabCAD and Stratasys (now the same company), announced a GrabCAD challenge to design the most practical possible 3D printed shell for CubeSats. The CubeSat Challenge was opened to anyone interested in designing for additive manufacturing, with prize support offered by Stratasys. Winners of the challenge were recently announced.

The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys. The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys.

The challenge drew over 200 respondents, many of whom were apparently already familiar with some of the design principles that makes additive manufacturing (AM) a growing presence in the aerospace field. One such advantage is the complexity of design afforded by AM, which allows for part consolidation.

“Engineers were able to reduce satellite structures from up to 50 parts down to two or three parts by using additive manufacturing,” said Scott Sevcik, business development manager for aerospace and defense at Stratasys. “There were a number of very creative approaches to redesigning the satellite structure, and it was great to see several of the entries consolidate the build down to two or as few as one part. That highlights one of the most significant benefits of 3D printing a structure.”

Such a large reduction in part count can offer significant advantages to production. It can reduce the cost of assembly labor by cutting time required to build a part. Fewer parts means reduced chance of assembly error, or a delay caused by a shortage of a single part. Along with the other benefits, reducing the number of parts also shortens the supply chain.

The overall winner of the CubeSat Challenge was Paolo Minetola from Italy. Minetola produced a design he named the “FoldSat” consisting of two parts and meant to be produced by Fused Deposition Modeling. Each part of the design consists of three faces. The faces fold up into half a square and are joined to the second half through simple snap mechanisms.

The interior of the design contains rails to assist with mounting electronics, and once assembled, a single side of the finished CubeSat can be swung open to allow access to the interior.

You can learn more about the other winners here.

Below you’ll find a video outlining the first interplanetary space mission to include CubeSats.


Source: Stratasys

Share This Article

Subscribe to our FREE magazine, FREE email newsletters or both!

Join over 90,000 engineering professionals who get fresh engineering news as soon as it is published.


About the Author

John Newman

John Newman is a Digital Engineering contributor who focuses on 3D printing. Contact him via [email protected] and read his posts on Rapid Ready Technology.

Follow DE
#21206