Latest News
January 1, 2007
By Pamela J. Waterman
Over the past few years, however, the field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been flooded with concurrent improvements in several key areas. These changes have new and old users embracing CFD capabilities in such wide-ranging applications that keeping track of them might require charting them on a logarithmic scale. DE spoke to a number of vendors about the factors influencing this trend.
A simple yet critical explanation for the increased use of CFD software lies in the fact that computer systems continue to become faster and cheaper. Five years ago, we devoured Pentium 4s at 2GHz with 256MBmemory and some parallel-processing capabilities. Now it’s easy to tap the resources of 64-bit dual and quad processors humming at 2.66GHz.Desktop systems boast 1GB memory along with multi-threading and distributed processing, while analysis programs “farm” their tasks out simultaneously to Unix, Linux, and Windows platforms.
> > Simulation for an axial inducer showing flow vectors calculated using ANSYS CFX and metal stress calculated using ANSYS Mechanical. This simulation was post-processed using a single post-processor.
Why is this increased power so important? All CFD problems are nonlinear, which immediately makes their solutions more processor and memory intensive than basic FEA computations. Fully defining the problem means defining data sets that include not only the object (to capture details of the interaction), but its “reverse volume,” either internally or to some distance around it. Add turbulence and unsteady conditions, and any advances in computing offer immediate benefits in CFD speed, efficiency, and overall performance.
Bob Williams, ALGOR’s product manager, explains typical expectations.“Designers and engineers have gotten used to the fact that most linear static stress and heat transfer analyses run in minutes,” he says,“even with large complex models. They also understand that moving into complex analyses like CFD would often take longer. But now, analyses that used to take one week, run overnight; and analyses that used to take eight hours, run in two hours.”
< < This Fluent simulation of the flow of air through the under hood region of a pickup truck is used to identify hot regions so that the cooling fan can be designed accordingly. The complexity of the geometry is indicative of the models being solved by engineers today. Parallel computing has made it possible to simulate problems like this that involve complicated geometry and a range of physical models.Post-processed by FIELDVIEW from Intelligent Light.
Meshing tools have also changed. Dennis Nagy, CD-adapco vice president of marketing and business development, says that meshers have improved across the board, making them accessible to a broader range of engineers.
“What was trail-blazing 10 years ago is now routine,” says Nagy. “Right now we might be able, with a 100 million-cell polyhedral model, to get an answer that’s as accurate as a billion-cell tetrahedral model.”
Other options that have arrived due to increased computing power include online subscription-based access to CFD services from such companies as ANSYS, CHAM, and Fluent, and the opportunity to harness the power of supercomputing resources (see sidebar “Super Power for Everyone"below).
TurboTax for Designers
Just as you don’t need to be an accountant to use TurboTax software,you don’t need to be an analyst with a Ph.D. to use many of today’s CFD packages. Ed Fontes, COMSOL vice president of applications, points out that CFD used to be done at a central research facility by specialists versed in a particular software package. He notes that now, “CFD is reaching all levels of product and process design and control, and is becoming popular even for freshmen at engineering schools.”
> > Water flow and mixing in a Grohe faucet simulated with EFD.Lab.
Making this capability usable for a non-expert population still depends on vendor support of the fundamentals, starting with the way MCAD models are handled. Jim Spann, vice president for North American marketing at Blue Ridge Numerics, says his company focuses on the needs of product development engineers, the over-worked multitaskers who say,“I don’t have time to learn a new geometry system.” The company’s CFdesign software actually goes into the MCAD system, and interrogates and “reads” the MCAD model, meaning the model the user sees in CFdesign is the MCAD model itself, not an import.
”]Product development engineers] don’t want CAE to change their processor to become their process,” says Spann. “They want it to fit their current process, and are intrigued by the possibility of saving time by getting information faster.” Blue Ridge’s CFdesign software connects MCAD and CAE using “integrated intelligence,” whereby CFdesign algorithms make meshing and analysis set-up decisions for the user —yet let the designer make the engineering decisions.
< < This is a diagram showing how an engineer can use ALGOR CFD to set up a model at his desktop then perform an analysis using a cluster of computers. This scenario is ideal for models that are too large to analyze on a single computer or to obtain fast solution times.
Flomerics also acknowledges the important CFD-and-MCAD connection,preferring direct interaction with native MCAD data to any geometry translation, copy, or “analysis version.” Mike Reynell, Flomerics director of marketing, says a major problem in translating a solid model is that the (empty) fluid space does not exist as a discrete object in the MCAD system. Managing this issue, Flomerics’ EFD software analyzes the MCAD model, automatically identifies fluid and solid regions, and defines and meshes the entire flow space in a single step.
COSMOS FloWorks takes the MCAD issue one step further, being fully embedded within SolidWorks 3D design software. It, too, automatically generates the fluid volume and updates all flow parameters based on changes to the associative SolidWorks geometry.
Other examples of CFD software directed at the MCAD user include Fluent for CATIA and FloWizard, both from ANSYS/Fluent, CFD-CADalyzer from ESI Group, and SC/Tetra from Software Cradle. Fluent’s software (again with automatic fluid domain creation) aims directly at design engineers,helping to eliminate ideas that won’t work, and optimizing the ones that will. CFD-CADalyzer, with built-in pre- and post-processors,simulates flow and heat transfer, and compares results over a range of geometries and operational conditions. SC/Tetra also offers a complete package that offers adaptive meshing and wizard-guidance.
Wider Markets
Paul Bemis, Fluent’s vice president of product management, offers this straightforward perspectives. “In the past, CFD was used by people who had no choice, working on jets, rockets, and overheated car engines,“he says. “They used CFD primarily as a forensic tool to understand failure. Now, with better predictability (results), people use CFD to help with the design decision process, hoping to optimize at the beginning.”
> > View of a transient fluid-structure interaction (FSI) in ABAQUS/CAE,analyzing the effects of blood flow on a diseased artery with an aneurysm. The contour plot in the top image shows static pressures in the fluid domain and a vector plot of these forces acting on the surrounding arterial wall. The middle image shows resulting displacement forces on the arterial wall. The contour plot in the bottom image shows fluid velocities within the artery and the Misesstresses on the wall structure. The analysis was performed with ABAQUS and Fluent software, with the FSI coupling managed by MpCCI.
Sheer numbers are behind some of the increased usage in CFD analyses.For example, electronics cooling has always represented a large portion of applications; nowadays, particularly in the automotive world, this percentage is rapidly increasing. According to Richard Bush, marketing director for NX digital simulation at UGS, a recent study showed that while the growth rate, say, for suppliers of chassis parts will increase at $13 billion per year for the next 10 years or so, the comparable yearly value for electronics modules will be $157 billion.
< < Radiation analysis of headlamps allows for bi-spectral heat sources including visible and IR spectrum radiation.
Even when compared to the general CAE market, the numbers are soaring. Chris Reid, vice president and general manager of the fluids business unit at ANSYS, notes that a Daratech study predicts an 18% growth rate for the CFD market through 2010, compared to 11-12% for CAE.
Besides the numbers, just the variety in CFD applications makes for a fun and mind-boggling read. CD-adapco has shown NASCAR designers that it’s not too complicated to run large-scale simulations of the airflow around a number of closely spaced, high-speed vehicles. Another customer modeled ductwork for power plants that must retrofit pollution-abatement systems (the analysis paid for itself in one hour).
> > Empowering engineers with CFD during the up front design phase means the software must deliver the know-how required to generate a mesh on complex MCAD assemblies. CFdesign uses integrated intelligence that automatically determines optimal mesh sizes for flow volumes and solids(see top image) before automatically generating a high-quality FE mesh for the user.
Peter Spalding, sales manager at CHAM, points out that CFD is also being applied to very topical issues such as fuel-cell design and global warming, with analyses of various pollution control approaches and wind and wave energy systems. For example, CHAM’s PHOENICS product can handle complex multi-phase and multi-fluid flows, such as modeling discharge of pollutants into rivers.
Multiphysics Now the Norm
“People like to look at problems in a multiphysics manner,” says ANSYS’ Reid, “because it gives them real-world results. As problems get bigger and more complicated you want better fidelity and to allow for more flexibility.” Reid says that multiphysics has always been at the forefront of ANSYS’ strategy and is one of the areas where the company continues to make investments, with fluid-structural interactions (FSI)being perhaps one of the most visible categories.
< < On the left, STAR-CCM+ from CD-adapco was used to analyze the wave pressures resulting from a giant wave slamming into an oil platform.
ALGOR also notes that the same engineers who used to only do FEA are now using CFD features. Williams explains, “It used to be that people thought CFD is much different than FEA. Now most FEA companies have some subset of CFD. We don’t even refer just to fluid flow any more.For example, there’s the coupling of heat transfer and fluid flow, and the direct effect on structures.”
COMSOL’s Fontes echoes these thoughts, describing two applications. “If you want to simulate the blood flow in a vein,” he says, “multiphysics is the only way to simulate, in a realistic fashion, the effect of FSI in the one-way venous valves. ]Then] in biotech and micro fluidics you often need to model the influence of electric fields on the flow pattern.” Fontes adds, “Ten years ago only a few engineers were doing thermal-fluid analysis in electronics — now it is pretty standard.” One COMSOL user is modeling MEMS structures for isolating individual DNA strands, a task that incorporates six different types of physics.
ABAQUS software from Simulia, Dassault’s umbrella name for its simulation solutions, draws on its long-standing strength in multiphysics in several ways. Simulia has created interfaces to such CFD packages as CD-adapco’s STAR-CD, letting structural designers work in a familiar environment. All kinds of nonlinear materials can be handled along with such conditions as partially shut-off flows. The ABAQUS scripting capability then lets users view results from both the FEA and CFD analyses in a single system.
> > When performing a CFD analysis, engineers set up a virtual model to predict how fluids will flow and the effects they will have on the structures with which they come into contact. Shown here is a valve assembly that was modeled in SolidWorks (left); then the user specified the surfaces for modeling the fluid medium in FEMPRO (center); and anew part was automatically created where fluid flow analysis will be performed (right). ALGOR automatically creates new parts where fluid flow analysis will be performed, which makes modeling fluid flow systems easier and faster.
High-end users reaping the benefits of this power include those dealing with complex FSI problems, such as UGS’ partner in fluid-thermal analyses, Maya HTT. One area of its expertise helps designers of headlamps, fog lamps, and other exotic lighting systems manage the strong coupling between radiative heating and 3D fluid flow. Maya software answers questions like, How does shadowing affect cooling,What about behavior at different wavelengths, and Will different kinds of plastic housings have different hot spots?
< < Multiphysics model of a micro-fluidic, 40 micron-diameter microchannel surface for analyzing single-strand DNA. Dr. Carl Meinhart, University of California Santa Barbara, used COMSOL Multiphysics software to model improving flow near the reaction surface using electro kinetic flow from two electrodes. Analysis involved modeling steady-state and transient cases of dielectrophoresis, electro thermal stirring, and an electro osmoticforce.
ESI Group also offers a multiphysics oriented product, the general, PDE(partial-differential equation) solver, CFD-ACE+, along with an automatic shrink-wrapping volume grid generator. An example where its FSI simulations quickly take on complicated physics involves automotive engine-compartment temperatures; CFD-ACE+ couples a turbulent flow module with convective and radiative heat transfer, providing answers in just days with accuracy within 3% of real-life tests.
Valuable Tool for Time and Money
Cheaper, faster, CFD is now affordable for many applications, and gives an understanding that would otherwise take expensive experiments to acquire. As Blue Ridge’s Spann puts it, “You can’t improve what you can’t see.” CFD analyses supply the “look inside” that many physical tests simply can’t provide. And that look inside can bring added insight, efficiency, and performance to product and system design.
Contributing Editor Pamela J. Waterman is an electrical engineer and freelance technical writer based in Arizona. Send your comments about this article through e-mail by clicking here. Please reference “CFD’s Expanding Role” in your message.
You may not have heard of the Council on Competitiveness, but its low-key work may enable you to become a supercomputer user without leaving your office or investing a million dollars. For example, this nonprofit D.C.-based group helped create an initiative connecting companies in need of high-performance computer power with CPU time available at government national laboratories such as Oak Ridge and Lawrence Berkeley.
Paul Bemis, vice president at Fluent, who sits on this council’s HPC Advisory Committee, explains that his company has now partitioned its software to run across 512 processors (with a 1024-processor version in the works) to help customers take advantage of this national computing-grid resource. This way, designers who have “never ever done simulation, and never ever used a supercomputer” will be guided in the process.—P.W.
ABAQUS, Inc.
Providence, RI
ALGOR, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
ANSYS, Inc.
Canonsburg, PA
Blue Ridge Numerics, Inc.
Charlottesville, VA
CD-adapco
Melville, NY
CHAM
London, UK
COMSOL, Inc.
Burlington, MA
COSMOS—SolidWorks Corp.
Santa Monica, CA
ESI Group
Huntsville, AL
Flomerics, Inc.
Marlborough, MA
Fluent, Inc.
Lebanon, NH
Intelligent Light
Rutherford, NJ
Software Cradle Co., Ltd.
Sterling Heights, MI
UGS/Maya HTT
Plano, TX
Subscribe to our FREE magazine,
FREE email newsletters or both!Latest News
About the Author
Pamela WatermanPamela Waterman worked as Digital Engineering’s contributing editor for two decades. Contact her via .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Follow DE